Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Miliband


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'm impressed by Quickbeam's commentary :) Irrespective, it's a delete here  Wifione  Message 05:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Marion Miliband

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is not inherited Darkness Shines (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * In this case why do we have articles on Obama's mother-in-law, step-father and pet dog? Quickbeam44 (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * We really have an article on Obama's dog? Darkness Shines (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes Quickbeam44 (talk) 00:08, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Clinton's cat too StarM 00:47, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * That is just, sad. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Lest anyone think we're partisan, Barney (dog). StarM 03:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Please take a look at WP:POINT, nominate any articles if you felt it should be deleted. ● Mehran Debate● 09:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Wasn't trying to make a point. I've had nothing to do with any of those, or this one. Just answering Darkness' question about whether we had such an article StarM 14:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to her husband's article. StarM 00:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Ralph Miliband. Newspapers write about presidential pets, not so much about reclusive Holocaust survivors. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I even opposed to redirecting. It fails WP:BIO. ● Mehran Debate● 09:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The usual exceptions are for spouses of heads of state, but otherwise only for  famous people who can be proven   to have had a significant influence discussed in reliable sources. This may be the case, but I don't see it.  DGG ( talk ) 22:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet our notability guidelines.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.