Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Scherer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Blueboy96 04:19, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Marion Scherer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable actress with only very minor roles Honey And Thyme (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Provisional Keep and request Admin closure of a Bad Faith nomination by an account that was created only today. When the nom's apparent SPA activity was brought into question, the account began nominating other articles so as to not appear a SPA. Intersting that a new account knows how to nominate an article, but does not notify any of the contributors to said article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree that the timeline of the nom's account creation and activies since then are a bit odd, as he has only gone on an afd tear, but need more info if you can. P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 01:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure wish I could give you more, but I'm not a checkuser.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Just as in the other AFD, I won't !vote simply because there is reason to question the activies of the nominator, and I don't want to reward those activities. If the article was that bad, someone else would have (will) renominate.  P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 11:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--lacks notability: I can't find anything but a tiny little bit on IMDB and a Facebook page. There's no notability here. Drmies (talk) 00:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The nom's very first act... before making a spelling correction... before adding a source to an article... before making a comment at a discussion... before asking a question of another editor... before themself partcipating in an AfD discussion... was to nominate an article for AfD. Not quite what is seen from a newcomer to Wiki.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The provisional keep !vote is bogus.  Either the deletion has merit, or it doesn't.  This one does (due to lack of non-trivial coverage by third party sources).  I trust the closing administrator can make the right decision based on the strength of the arguments presented on the whole rather than how new the (single-purposed) nominator's account is.  JBsupreme (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Much as I hate to delete someone with such memorable roles (per IMDb) as "Woman in Bar" and "Blonde" (in two different shows; a cross-over!)... the nom does have a point. --GRuban (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - her film work as documented in IMDB is unremarkable, but she has received coverage for her one-man play, , as well as being noticed when making her local theatre debut . However, the coverage is not substantial enough to meet notability. -- Whpq (talk) 19:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.