Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marios Kyriazis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The additional sources found over the course of the AFD appear to be sufficient to meet GNG. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:41, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Marios Kyriazis
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subject T0mpr1c3 (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The more you look at the sources, the more they fail the Wikipedia trifecta of reliable, independent and secondary. Guy (Help!) 21:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 00:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 00:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 00:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 00:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tyw7</i>  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 00:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG Snowycats (talk) 16:25, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Here are two detailed unverified bios. Here are two lists of more technical publications. There are several popular press books too. Here is a mention. StrayBolt (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could find no decent sources. Not notable enough. Alexbrn (talk) 17:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep — I added a few sources. Looks like many old ones sources were deleted, but they don't have online links so it is harder to look at the content. StrayBolt (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * They were probably deleted for being self-published, self-promoting, and added to the article by the subject himself. T0mpr1c3 (talk) 21:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep since subject meets WP:NPERSON per WP:V, e.g. Independent, South Africa article; Times of India article; Daily Telegraph article; The Times article. -The Gnome (talk) 07:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory <small style="color:#555"> (u • t • c) 18:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability is satisfied by the sources above (though I'd discount the first for info on the actual person), whether using WP:GNG or WP:NPERSON. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:50, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Can't say that he has an impressive career as an author or a scholar, but given the interest shown by the media on his work from the sources found, I think he should qualify under GNG. Hzh (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep agree pr . Emily Khine (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes. NANExcella (talk) 11:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.