Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MariposaHD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

MariposaHD

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about non-notable internet show with heavy COI edits. User:MariposaHD has an edit history showing that they have gone through related articles and inserted references to the show. Ideally these should be reverted also. While there are hits on Google, most are sites pointing to torrents to download the show. I was not able to find references that could be used as reviews or other noteworthy coverage. Ham Pastrami (talk) 05:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I contributed this article and I have no relation to the show. Also, others have edited it as well.  It is significant for various reasons, including its distribution method and notability.  I do NOT believe it should be deleted.  Seyon  —Preceding comment was added at 15:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you provide reliable sources to confirm your assertion? Ham Pastrami (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Don't see how this passes WP:WEB. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keilana | Parlez ici 00:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. (Note: I tried adding a comment before, but I think it didn't get through, so I'll write it again.  Sorry if it shows up a second time.)  Well, I know about the show, but when I decided to look up more info (like where they shoot) I went to look here.  Pleased to find an article here, but unhappy to see a deletion proposal.  See, I think the article is not "non-notable".  If said user went for advertising on other pages it is regrettable, but shouldn't have any relevance about wether to keep this article or not. rotane (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   CWii ( Talk  22:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete ad-like.   CWii ( Talk  23:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:RS PKT (talk) 00:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources do not establish notability —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.210.172 (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.