Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariqueen Maandig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Too many !votes from SPA s to establish consensus. No prejudice against a speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Mariqueen Maandig

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason Msmiserie (talk) 01:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC) — Msmiserie (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep, this was the first place I came to get information about her when I found out Trent Reznor is enaged. Please, she has her own career that makes her interesting as well. gag01001 (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2009
 * Delete, lacks notability. This page was only created due to the Trent Reznor engagement, and aside from that engagement, the woman is unknown.  The page was created by Kiwipat, who is one of the few people supporting that the page should be kept.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.36.193 (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)  — 67.70.36.193 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep, Playboy model, singer in group with Wikipedia article, and, oh yeah, engaged to Trent Reznor. 31,000 Google hits. Joey the Mango (talk) 17:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, she's a leading member of a group with its own article.--Kiwipat (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep on the grounds that the nominator has not provided a reason for deletion. Will redact if valid reason provided. KuyaBriBri Talk 15:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, This person lacks notability.--Msmiserie (talk) 09:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC) — Msmiserie (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment: Redacted my above comment as promised; nominator provided a reason for deletion (albeit one that is contained in the opinion essay WP:ATA). KuyaBriBri Talk 14:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Article subject lacks notability.  Article subject is not a Playboy Playmate.  She is the singer of a virtually unknown band, for which no other members have a Wikipedia page because they are not notable either.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.149.111 (talk) 12:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)  — 99.238.149.111 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete No reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.