Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marisol Rubio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to 2024 California State Senate election. Liz Read! Talk! 06:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Marisol Rubio

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Highest office is a city council. No national news coverage or really any coverage at all outside of routine campaign/municipal politics stuff. Clearly does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 06:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Biology, Medicine,  and California.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  07:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Cited in the following news coverage. There is more and I will post when located.
 * CAMPAIGN2020: Candidate Marisol Rubio hopes State Senate District 7 Voters Are Ready For A Change - YouTube
 * City of San Ramon passes new firearm storage ordinance – NBC Bay Area MRC2024 (talk) 07:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: WP:ATD is draftification or redirect until the election. Curbon7 (talk) 22:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Amy Scott-Slovick, AD 15 Eboard Member to the CA Dem Party, Associate Member of the Dem Party of CCC, Delegate at the Contra Costa Labor Council.
 * Marisol has had multiple news coverage across the Bay Area and, in addition to her two elected positions held to date, she serves in leadership positions across California and the country. I can verify and attest to the accuracy of the information provided on this page to date and ask that it not be removed because there is no justifiable reason to do so. MRC2024 (talk) 05:49, 30 November Wikipedia.
 * The information on Marisol Rubios Wikipedia page is correct. Marisol Rubio is an elected San Ramon City Council person. She is an active member of the CA Dem Party. She was elected to the water board prior to being elected to city council.  Marisol Rubio is a member of SEIU-2015.  She is a co-chair/vice chair of the CA Dem Party's Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion committee. Marisol has been in many local news stations reports in the  Bay Area. She stood in solidarity with the striking SEIU-UHW workers at Kaiser Permanente Walnut Creek and I witnessed her being interviewed by a reporter that day and saw it on the local news that evening. I serve with Marisol as a delegate to the Contra Costa Labor Council and as an active member of the Dem Party of Contra Costa in California. Please don't remove this page, it is accurate and I attest to the facts shared here.
 * Nobody is disputing the accuracy of the page. We are discussing whether or not she is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. Appearing on local news a couple times does not prove notability. Read WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 20:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting. What is the suggested Redirect target article? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet GNG--Mpen320 (talk) 04:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * If the result of the discussion was a redirect, the obvious target would be 2024 California State Senate election. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 20:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. City council is not a level of office that guarantees inclusion in Wikipedia, and unelected candidates in future state legislative elections do not get articles on those grounds either — and simply having a normal level of run of the mill local coverage of local politics in the local media, where such coverage of local politics is merely expected, is not enough to deem her more special than everybody else, because every other city councillor on earth has similar levels of local coverage in his or her local media too. Obviously no prejudice against recreation next November if she wins the state legislature seat, but nothing here is already enough as of right now. Bearcat (talk) 22:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Argument for maintaining the article about Marisol Rubio in Wikipedia.
 * The argument for deletion of Marisol Rubio’s article appears to hinge on Honorable Marisol Rubio only being of interest to local populations.
 * I direct your attention to:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Demographics_of_California
 * Demographics of California - Wikipedia
 * California is the most populated U.S. state, with an estimated population of 38.9 million as of 2023. [1] It has people from a wide variety of ethnic, racial, national, and religious backgrounds. Population California is the most populated sub-national entity in North America.
 * And too:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Bay_Area
 * My argument is that in the San Francisco Bay Area being involved to the level that Ms. Rubio is involved is significant.
 * Of note she is an up and coming elected progressive woman who champions the environment (Sierra Club) and inclusion (CA Democratic Party JEDI Board- https://cadem.org/standing-committee/diversity-equity-inclusion-committee/) and she is currently running for CA District 9 State Senator seat.
 * In California, our state senators represent more people than our elected members to the House of Representatives.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_State_Senate
 * I read a recent post that verified what was in the Wikipedia information about Marisol Rubio and I too can verify that the information is factual. But then I saw from another post that stated that it isn’t whether the information is factual but whether it is notable. As a user of Wikipedia I appreciate being able to search for honest and reliable information. Regarding the maintaining of the article is the question. My position is that the article on Marisol Rubio should be maintained because she is running for CA State Senate to represent just under one million people (my community). I believe this article will be/is of service to our community in getting to know about an outstanding community activist, a woman who is a member of a minority, from the working class who is running for the CA Senate. She is a role model and I do not believe that she nor the work that she has done is "run of the mill". 2601:644:9200:A31B:A48C:8654:95AE:867 (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Right...I'm sure you, the anonymous user typing out an overly formal essay praising Marisol Rubio, are a totally different person compared to the first commenter, who was also an anonymous user typing out an overly formal essay praising Marisol Rubio. There are over 100 state senate candidates in CA every two years and tens of thousands of city councilors. Giving all of them a Wikipedia page would be ridiculous. And that's even besides the point because, even if your argument was sensible, that's not Wikipedia's current policy, so this page should still be deleted. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 03:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearcat's reasoning. Should Rubio win the state senate election, which is almost a year from now, then the article can be recreated as she would pass WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * In California, our state senators represent more people than our elected members to the House of Representatives.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_State_Senate
 * I read a recent post that verified what was in the Wikipedia information about Marisol Rubio and I too can verify that the information is factual. But then I saw from another post that stated that it isn’t whether the information is factual but whether it is notable. As a user of Wikipedia I appreciate being able to search for honest and reliable information. Regarding the maintaining of the article is the question. My position is that the article on Marisol Rubio should be maintained because she is running for CA State Senate to represent just under one million people (my community). I believe this article will be/is of service to our community in getting to know about an outstanding community activist, a woman who is a member of a minority, from the working class who is running for the CA Senate. She is a role model and I do not believe that she nor the work that she has done is "run of the mill". 2601:644:9200:A31B:A48C:8654:95AE:867 (talk) 01:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Right...I'm sure you, the anonymous user typing out an overly formal essay praising Marisol Rubio, are a totally different person compared to the first commenter, who was also an anonymous user typing out an overly formal essay praising Marisol Rubio. There are over 100 state senate candidates in CA every two years and tens of thousands of city councilors. Giving all of them a Wikipedia page would be ridiculous. And that's even besides the point because, even if your argument was sensible, that's not Wikipedia's current policy, so this page should still be deleted. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 03:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearcat's reasoning. Should Rubio win the state senate election, which is almost a year from now, then the article can be recreated as she would pass WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Right...I'm sure you, the anonymous user typing out an overly formal essay praising Marisol Rubio, are a totally different person compared to the first commenter, who was also an anonymous user typing out an overly formal essay praising Marisol Rubio. There are over 100 state senate candidates in CA every two years and tens of thousands of city councilors. Giving all of them a Wikipedia page would be ridiculous. And that's even besides the point because, even if your argument was sensible, that's not Wikipedia's current policy, so this page should still be deleted. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 03:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearcat's reasoning. Should Rubio win the state senate election, which is almost a year from now, then the article can be recreated as she would pass WP:NPOL. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.