Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marit Jessen Rüdiger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Marit Jessen Rüdiger

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOLITICIAN Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as page creator. Another Danish politician that should be an obvious keep. Former leader of the North Schleswig minority party in Denmark. Meets GNG by having received plenty of independent reliable press coverage, in both Danish and Schleswig-Holsteiner news. There are already some good examples on the page. I agree that her local political office does not provide her any notability, but that also isn't what makes her notable. Her leadership of Schleswig Party is what makes her notable, as I see it. Kaffe42 (talk) 19:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being leader of a minor political party is not an automatic notability freebie that would exempt a person from having to get over WP:GNG on the sourcing, and the sourcing present here isn't enough to get her over GNG for it. Bearcat (talk) 18:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NPOLITICIAN. No significant coverage available; does not meet either part of policitian in the status; nor do the sources meet GNG. Garnarblarnar (talk) 02:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.