Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marius Black


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | converse _ 18:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Marius Black

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Artist is not described in WP:SECONDARY sources, does not meet WP:BASIC or WP:GNG. The article appears to be promotional, using only primary sources. Binksternet (talk) 05:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

It is not promotinal, it is a Legitimate article. Mark.f.reyes 08:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.f.reyes (talk • contribs)


 * He may not be known worldwide yet. But he is an artist. All the informations in the article are all true. I personally interviewed him. For when should we create an article about someone? when they are already dead? Mark.f.reyes 08:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. When? When they meet WP:NOTABILITY. Johnbod (talk) 09:33, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not easy to ask someone to be interviewed if that someone is already a big time celebrity. Mark.f.reyes 10:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.f.reyes (talk • contribs)
 * Delete: no indication of notability; only sources are social media; no finds in secondary sources. BethNaught (talk) 11:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not the place to publish your interviews with rising celebrities who have not come to be noticed.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of WP:NOTABILITY. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Then, what is wikipedia used for? Mark.f.reyes 03:35, 19 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark.f.reyes (talk • contribs)
 * See the Five Pillars of Wikipedia and what Wikipedia is not. (Also, ensure you sign your posts by using four tildes like this: ~ .) BethNaught (talk) 07:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * snow delete blatantly fails WP:BIO. looks self promotional. LibStar (talk) 11:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.