Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marjorie-Wiki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The lack of sourcing means that this does not meet our inclusion threashold Spartaz Humbug! 11:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Marjorie-Wiki

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

Self-promotion and indiscriminate publicity (WP:WEB). Not relevant for Wikipedia. --Harbelser (talk) 23:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. The irony here is palpable, and threatens a recursive loop the size of Belgium. But, in this case, I can't really find satisfactory sources, English or German, to use as references. There's the one article, but wikindex and the site itself don't pass muster. Happy to look at this again if more sources are found - and I stress that it's a great project. Just might not be notable. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep! First, sorry for the bad English, it is a Google translation: The project is similar to Deletionpedia, a rescue portal, here, however, articles can be created and edited. This is not advertising, it´s a project description. It also collaborates with the Wikipedia project "Other wikis". Lady Whistler (talk) 14:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 21:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

In addition, this is a German Wiki, I see there no irelevance (prevarication) for the English Wikipedia!!! They possibly? Greetings from Wikia (Helper) Michael McCouman jr.15:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.25.108.127 (talk)
 * Keep Hello ladies and gentlemen, I finds this project encourage very much. Unfortunately, I do not know really which criteria they see in it? I see reasons for a deletion here on no case! Please, they think over your behavior and found your opinion. ( This is no English of Google;) )


 * Keep first of all, the nominator for this deletion seems to be a single purpose account. There is this entry plus an entry on the articles author, in German fooling the author. This behaviour should not be supported. There are +12.000 article in this wiki project, most of them deleted from de.wikipedia, some articles are really interesting to read. I would perfectly understand your deletion since it is in german, but please don´t be fooled by this single purpose account. Thanks SlartibErtfass der bertige (talk) 16:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * While there may be some concern over a new account nominating an article for deletion, other concerns stand - and I'm happy to keep the article if sources exist to show it has some notability. Are there articles or other reliable sources that discuss the website? My concern is that I can't find any such reliable sources, in English or in German, to show notability - and we can't keep it if that's the case. Your concerns about the nominator are noted, but please address my concerns as well. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 17:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * here are the contribution of this single purpose account greetings SlartibErtfass der bertige (talk) 19:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete SlartibErtfass der bertige and Lady Whistler are both poor English-speaking authors of this small German website. Don`t take them seriously. --Harbelser (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * wow, your 4th edit. Thank you btw SlartibErtfass der bertige (talk) 08:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Harbelser, You're the nominator, it's presumed that you recommend deletion. No need to do so twice. Also, please comment on the article and its merits (or lack thereof), not on the editors defending it. Thanks. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 17:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Read this edit! User:Harbelser leads a fight with Whistler's Lady Marjorie Wiki --Druffeler (talk) 08:38, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That's a talk page, not an edit - and doesn't seem to discuss this article at all. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.