Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marjorie Susan Mary Maclachlan, 24th of Maclachlan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Marjorie Susan Mary Maclachlan, 24th of Maclachlan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ANYBIO. Part of a group of articles that use a genealogy web site as a source and make no sufficient claims to notability. Domdeparis (talk) 09:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating for the same reasons the following pages created by the same user

Domdeparis (talk) 09:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all - these articles show no signs of notability other than being a clan chief, and that in itself is not sufficient to merit an article for each individual holder. Any relevant information in these article could be added to Clan Maclachlan. Dunarc (talk) 15:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Also it is worth noting if these articles are deleted then Category:Clan Maclachlan may be a little redundant, so its future might then need to be discussed. Dunarc (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Just for info I have nominated the following article as a speedy copyvio John Maclachlan, 23rd of Maclachlan. The source is the same geneaology page as the other articles. It contains errors and I have serious doubts that it can be used as a WP:RS. It states that he was a "commander" in a British army regiment. This rank does not exist in the army and searching a bit further I found that he had been a major and had commanded the regiment, so he could have been described as the commanding officer. The web site that this info comes from Burke's peerage as a source to justify that he "gained the rank of commander" I doubt that Burke's peerage would make a such an error. It also states that Bristol is in Gloucestershire...this is also false as it has been a City and County since 1373. I think I may see about adding this web site to the list of unreliable sources. Domdeparis (talk) 15:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment I have posted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Scotland to alert a relevant Wikiproject. Pam  D  09:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Delete all - relationships do not confer notability and it is not inherited WP:INVALIDBIO.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.