Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark's Bistro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete G11 by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Mark's Bistro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No Reliable Sources for this restaurant, does not appear to meet WP:CORP PGWG (talk) 17:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to Draftspace and tag as low potential per Wikipedia_talk:Drafts. Plausibly notable and we shouldn't drive content creators away. WikiCreativeJuicer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * WikiCreativeJuicer has been blocked as a sockpuppet. -- Red rose64 (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication of notability, borderline G11. Draftspace is not meant as a dungheap. Huon (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Being frequented by non-notable people is not a claim of notability for a restaurant. No reliable source coverage is present here at all. And Huon is correct that draftspace is not a permanent holding tank that confers a permanent exemption from the article ever having to be ready for prime time — nothing here suggests that notability (which is conditional on sourceability) is even remotely "plausible". And for added bonus, the "tagging drafts" section that WikiCreativeJuicer linked to above is just an unresolved one-week-old proposal for how to deal with draftspace content — the templates listed there don't even exist to be used in the purpose proposed for them. A process that doesn't even exist yet cannot already be an alternative to the processes we do have. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't even find evidence online that the place exists. The whole thing smells of a prank to me. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 03:50, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Agreed. I can't find any evidence that the place exists as a Sydney restaurant. (There seems to be a place of that name in the U.S., in Omaha, Nebraska, but without a connection here.) Looks like a case of WP:MADEUP. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 22:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.