Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Aslett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Mark Aslett

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability is under question per WP:GNG and anybio. Too many cut-n-paste phrases from a corporate website Driodr (talk) 17:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Another beefed up linkedin post. I don't need to have quotes giving us his advice, nothing notable found. Oaktree b (talk) 23:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. And it has been created by a WP:SPA. --Suitskvarts (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Did a deep dive and I wasn't able to find anything that I could add that would support this article.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 09:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep since I think this is somewhat notable. Since it is the current CEO of a company, and since it has a ton of passing mentions. As stated in WP:NOT, This is okay to keep. As long it is somewhat improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ploreky (talk • contribs) 02:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Too heavy a use of primary sources. Gusfriend (talk) 08:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.