Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Baer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Mark Baer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not sure how this family divorce attorney is notable. He writes for one publication. So? This article is written as an advertisement, and I can see no reliable third-party coverages that makes its inclusion worthy on WP. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 16:43, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable--Epeefleche (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Mark Baer doesn’t remotely have the notability sufficient for inclusion in Wikipedia. His article was created by a red-text, single-purpose account. Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages. Greg L (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I deleted the "practice areas" section because that was the part that was flagged as sounding like an advertisement. I can't see what else could be an issue, as I've tried to make the article objective. She Rusty Wake —Preceding unsigned comment added by She Rusty Wake (talk • contribs) 18:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC) — She Rusty Wake (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The fact that the editor has only edited this page is highly suspicious of advertising. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 20:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely non-notable. No independent coverage at all, references are primary sources or directories. There are 200,000 attorneys in California; we don't need an article on each of them. --MelanieN (talk) 15:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.