Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bauhaus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  16:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Mark Bauhaus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Every reference is an incidental mention or PR; (I have noticed the group of articles for executives of this company--for almost all companies, only the CEO is likely to be notable). This apparently  date back to 2009. I shall probably nominate some of the other individuals in the category also, but they need to be considered individually, for a few might for one reason or another actually be notable)  DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  20:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable midlevel executive. I considered redirecting to Juniper Networks but I think that would be inappropriate since he is not mentioned at that page. --MelanieN (talk) 04:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:42, 27 November 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete - BLP sourced to mostly non-independent internal profiles and automatically generated profiles based on the same information. There's no real significant coverage in independent sources.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 06:58, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.