Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Beaumont (journalist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Mark Beaumont (journalist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is just a collection of quotes by this person; there's nothing here that's actually about them. There's also a lot of unsourced opinions ("believed to be", "considered by" etc). There was some involvement in the Keith Richards snorting thing, but as a BLP1E thing that's definitely about Keef not the journo. Chris (talk) 07:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Long established journalist writing for The Guardian, NME, Uncut and other publications, as well as a published author. However it's an absolutely terrible article, much of which can be excised. yorkshiresky (talk) 19:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep It should be kept. It needs a lot of editing though. But hope some people are going to contribute to this article to make it a better article. 8th September 2010 3:52 IST

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  chat 23:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪    ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  10:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No additional comments post the previous re-listing; hence I'm relisting to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per the above. Passes WP:CREATIVE #1 - "widely cited by peers or successors." Tevildo (talk) 21:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.