Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bell (powerlifter)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 13:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Mark Bell (powerlifter)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Happy to be wrong about this, but thought I'd throw it to the community. Seems to only reference simple listings and appears to be somewhat promotional making it fall short of WP:NSPORTS, I didn't see an exception carved out in the SNG for this. A preliminary WP:BEFORE didn't appear to be much beyond blogs and passing mentions. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  20:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. Killiondude (talk) 00:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. Killiondude (talk) 00:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:08, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * delete I don't see the coverage to meet the GNG. Most of the sources are just rankings, there aren't multiple cases of significant coverage in reliable sources.Sandals1 (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no specific notability criteria for weightlifters, so the WP:GNG must be the basis of our votes. I do not see the kind of coverage I believe is required to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 22:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.