Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Borowiecki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete &mdash;  caknuck  °  is back from his wikisiesta  18:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Mark Borowiecki

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

IP deleted prod. Player fails WP:ATHLETE, as well as WP:HOCKEY notability standards  Grsz  talk  00:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable junior player who has yet to play professionally so fails to meet notability requirements. -Djsasso (talk) 22:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Djsasso.  Black  ngold29   01:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:ATHLETE and the WP:HOCKEY notability standards.  Fifth round picks do not often make the major leagues, and going to Clarkson, any professional play might be four years away, quite aside from that very few pros come out of that program.  Unfortunately, we see this syndrome every year, where a raft of junior league players get written up for articles just because they're drafted, and many never see a professional game.    RGTraynor  02:25, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete He fails WP:ATHLETE as he has never played in a fully professional league nor competed at the highest level in an amateur league. —  Wen li  (reply here) 03:50, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 05:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete He would either have to play professionally or win the Hobey Baker. Patken4 (talk) 22:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet any notability standards. – Nurmsook! (talk) 05:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.