Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Breeze


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:41, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Mark Breeze

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page fails to meet the standard of WP:BLP, as well as a lack of WP:NN. This article has been left flagged for years, and there seems to be no desire to improve it, or show notability. Apriestofgix (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 18:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Very clearly meets WP:MUSIC because two of the songs that he is credited as a main artist on made the top twenty of the UK singles chart. (Musician criteria 2 is "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.") He is less famous than his collaborator Darren Styles, but this does not make him non-notable. KaisaL (talk) 23:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - WP:MUSIC - Two of his singles have their own Wikipedia articles and have been on the Finnish, UK and Irish single charts. According to WP:CHART these are notable national music charts. -- Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 20:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * We also have to consider WP:BLP, but yes, I will concede he does appear to meet notability guidelines. Apriestofgix (talk) 18:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - he's had two top-20 hits in the UK. That has been more than enough to keep according to precedents. Bearian (talk) 18:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.