Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Buswell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete (A7). –MuZemike 00:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Mark Buswell

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The subject of the article is clearly non-notable. A quick glance through the sources show that only one refer to him at all, on which he is simply named as a teacher. It is my belief that the article utterly fails notability guidelines, as a teacher is not famous enough to be covered. Additionally, as he is a teacher, it is likely that the creation of the article is a joke from a student. Either way, it is difficult to see why the article should be included, it is both unnecessary and inaccurate Insdel (talk) 16:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. There is no claim to notability made for the subject in this article. The references to a baronetcy are irrelevant to this article; the baronetcy went extinct (for lack of male-line descendants) over 300 years ago, and so there is no clear connection between the baronetcy and this subject. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.