Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Butt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Mark Butt

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Obvious vanity page for a person who appears to have no particular notability or importance. The figure skating activities described in the article do not meet the WP:ATHLETE notability criteria of having competed at the "highest level" of the sport; see WP:WPFIGURE/N for further discussion on notability guidelines for figure skaters. I previously marked the article for speedy delete with concerns noted on the talk page, but notice was removed, so I'm doing it the hard way now..... Dr.frog (talk) 06:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Assistant admissions guy" does not come close to being a notable position, and the U.S. collegiate figure skating championship does not meet WP:ATHLETE.  A search of the GNews archive returns nothing that appears to relate to this Mark Butt, and I can find no other significant evidence of notability.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 06:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a resume service Rotovia (talk) 10:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, nowhere near notable. Several non-notable activities do not add up to one notable one. Hairhorn (talk) 11:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:Athlete and WP:BIO. Aside from his personal or work pages, the only source I found was this blog interview. Even if we say it's an expert blog and constitutes a RS, there is still a COI issue with it. PDCook (talk) 14:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable as athlete or person related to a university. Kolindigo (talk) 21:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable - no ifs or buts about it!.  Looks like a case of self promotion to me. Wikipeterproject (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.