Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark David Major


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Mark David Major

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. Autobiography. Google returns 79 hits with little direct coverage. Besides self-published works (one of which is given with no title and an ISBN that leads nowhere), the references in the article include a broken link (the Henderson one), a person who in an off-line source apparently called him a "genius", an article in a local newspaper from near his high school hometown (Belleville is near Collinsville) about a play of his that was being put on locally, and a vanity listing in Who's Who Among American High School Students. His listed works likewise have almost no coverage. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - In my own search, I thought I had found some coverage, but as the navigation trail shows ("Home / News / Press Releases / Arts & Entertainment"), it's a press release. -- Whpq (talk) 16:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - I know the person who is actively editing Mr. Major's page and she has nearly 90 more print and electronic references to add to the page. I suggest patience Gattvolgio (talk) 16:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC) — Gattavolgio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The user isn't Mark David Major? Unless her initials are also MDM and her last name is also Major, then she's pretty much impersonating him, and it's kind of surprising that when I tagged the article as an autobiography and left her a notice about that, she saw no reason to explain that it isn't an autobiography. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:07, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I think that MDmajor19 could be the 19-year old daughter of the writer, who himself prefers the nick Gattavolgio. Delete anyway as N/N. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 07:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If she has a case to make for keeping the article based on her intentions and resources, she would ideally be making that case here herself, relating her intentions first-hand and giving concrete examples of the resources. —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wow, massive promotional and seemingly autobiographical (whether he posted it himself or not) article on a non-notable person. Unless some abundant external independent reliable major notability is demonstrated pronto, then my !vote remains Delete. (BTW, I agree with Why should I have a User Name? that Gattavolgio appears to be the party himself, and only created his account to make the one comment above.) Softlavender (talk) 02:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - with all apologies to Mr. Major, he appears to be run of the mill from the sourcing - Who's Who Amongst High Schoolers and the Local Newsweekly? I'd be willing to change my mind if the sourcing were both independent and reliable as well as being significant and more than mere passing. Bearian (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Addendum I discovered that the first of the works cited to support the claim that Major has been called a "genius" has more than the one author originally listed. In fact, it's actually by him. The author he referenced, Tena L. Griffin, cowrote the preface. So the person calling him a genius is a collaborator of his. It's a self-published book, by the way, published by CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.