Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Desvaux


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 05:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Mark Desvaux

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dubious notability, comes off as spam and self-promotion, most likely conflict of interest WP:SPA account involved in edit history. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: Please see also q:Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Mark Desvaux. Thank you, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as pure WP:ADVERT lacking in sufficient WP:RS to establish WP:N per WP:BIO. Qworty (talk) 22:37, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I visited Mark's site which indicates that he has been "featured" in some notable places (BBC, The Guardian, London Times, and so on) yet aside from the passing mention in the Guardian article already used as a reference in this article, I can't find anything. It seems like these claims are from a self-promoter and aren't credible. The creator of this article also created TRL Music, which is also nominated for deletion. --  At am a  頭 19:08, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete It lacks the coverage enough to meet the inclusion guidelines. — ΛΧΣ  21™  03:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.