Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Di Stefano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Mark Di Stefano

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a case of WP:BLP1E, the only thing he's known for is the controversy. As such, this page is massively undue in overstating this, and is full of speculation and selective quoting. This draft was rejected twice and moved from article to draft space already, but the creator just wrote is again in article space. We shouldn't have such negative, undue articles on living people. Complaint about it was made at Teahouse (if someone can add perm link, would be appreciated) Joseph2302 (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. <b style="color:#CCCC00">Joseph</b><b style="color:#00FF00">2302</b> (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete Sounds about right. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

(Service) Teahouse diff Victor Schmidt (talk) 14:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete When the article was first created, I suggested on its talk page that the mention of the incident with refs should be added to Zoombombing instead. The BLP isn't notable outside of WP:ONEEVENT, and even the event isn't notable enough for a stand-alone article, but it would be relevant in the Zoombombing article. Schazjmd   (talk)  14:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely WP:UNDUE. Not sure what I just saw, but it isn't an encyclopedia article. Hillelfrei   talk   15:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing notable; nothing worth salvaging. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - one event does not notability make. Even as an example of zoombooming, it was a yawn. David notMD (talk) 16:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BLP1E. Guy (help!) 13:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the above reasons, I would also say it seems primarily an attack page. Zoozaz1 (talk) 01:30, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The page seems to be created for the sole reason of attacking its subject, it is also out of date and poorly written/formatted. It doesn't fit the characterisitics a Wikipedia page needs. Heyoostorm (talk) 13:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.