Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Easton (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per consensus --Anthony.bradbury"talk"  19:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Mark Easton (musician)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable musician, fails WP:ENTERTAINER and around over 793,000 Google search hits. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 23:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Candy Harlots which is the band that he founded. It's not clear that Candy Harlots is notable either but if it is, then redirecting would be the right thing to do.  If they aren't, the redirect will be deleted if/when the Cany Harlots article is deleted.  I could not find any reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Per Esradekan, the redirect might not be all that useful. I still think a redirect would be okay, but I am not adverse to deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. I personally don't see the point in a redirect due to the non-plausible nature of the title as a search term. FYI: Candy Harlots passes WP:MUSIC for multiple releases on Virgin Records.   Esradekan Gibb    "Klat" 04:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:VERIFY and WP:MUSIC. — Satori Son 21:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, etc. And if kept it would require more rework to remove the vanispamcruft. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.