Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Eshleman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Twenty One Pilots.  MBisanz  talk 01:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Mark Eshleman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. Fails any form of WP:N. Article fails to make a credible claim of notability. Should be a Speedy candidate. red dogsix (talk) 03:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   16:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete He is some kind of director for the band Twenty One Pilots. Its not quite sure what his role is, but he made some of their videos. The gist is, apart from his connection to the band there is nothing noteworthy about him. Coverage of him as person is completely sparse, he only gets a couple of passing mentions in third-tier media when they talk about the band. There is an interview in the Sun-Sentinel (already in the article) but thats basically everything which can be found about him. Per our notability requirements we need significant coverage in multiple independent sources in-depth about the subject. This is not fulfilled with some passing mentions and a single interview. His only notability claim is his association with the band, but thats not enough for anything according to our criteria and guidelines. He fails WP:DIRECTOR in all points and with the lack of reliable source which do in-depth coverage he also fails WP:GNG and/or WP:NBIO very clearly. The article should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary (talk) 12:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to stake claim of notability by association. No significant references outside of his role in working with Twenty One Pilots. If he merits any presence at all on wikipedia it should be on that page, not as a stand alone article. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 15:41, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Twenty One Pilots per WP:ATD-R. Adam9007 (talk) 15:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.