Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Foster (music critic)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Mark Foster (music critic)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable music critic. The article does not meet WP:BIO and WP:V standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, at least for now. If he died in 2001, and the article doesn't mention when he was active, it may be that the contributions for which he was notable are beyond the reach of google. Most music critics strike me as a waste of space, but that's not a good enough reason to banish the entry. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 04:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:58, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. He is not listed in the Encyclopedia of Popular Music. Of the eight articles that mention "Mark Foster" in Music Index none are about the music critic, most are about the classical conductor Mark Foster. This Mark Foster was not found in Marquis Who's Who on the Web. --Bejnar (talk) 04:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete writing for a few notable publications doesn't make you notable - or every advertiser in the newspaper is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.