Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Gilmartin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Mark Gilmartin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence subject meets criteria of WP:BIO or WP:ATHLETE, as he has only competed in national amateur tournaments but not won any. Contested prod. ... disco spinster   talk  16:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions.  — Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  — Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I have added cited sources to Mark Gilmartin's page and am contesting deletion. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to prevent his page from being deleted. Thank you very much. :) Joyprice7 (talk)joyprice7 —Preceding undated comment added 18:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: References are promotional in nature so are not reliable sources. Oonissie (talk) 17:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet WP:ATHLETE for golf and does not meet WP:BIO for business. Also, does not appear to meet WP:GNG.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.