Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Hobart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Mark Hobart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable model/actor. One unsourced extra part in a movie, the rest is commercials. Fails WP:NMODEL. Sjö (talk) 10:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree with nom, almost all work is commercials. No reliable refs to be found, but his name is common.  Bgwhite (talk) 21:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

'''WHY ISN'T THIS A REFERENCE? http://www.acquamodels.com/news/7745 Excuse the caps.'Italic text''

Added an additional reference - http://www.pen-online.jp/news/info/sirthomaslipton/

ADDED another additional REFERENCE from Cinema A La Carte - http://www.cinemawith-alc.com/2015/09/lipton.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by LilyTiare (talk • contribs)
 * These are not references. They are just ads.  Per WP:GNG, references need to be independent, reliable and the subject receive significant coverage.  Bgwhite (talk) 09:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Jeesh!!! Sir Thomas Lipton (Mark Hobart) is pretty known here in Japan, China, Singapore and a few other Asian countries. I am trying my best to meet wikipedia requirements. And surely do not want the article removed. Been in countless TVCMs, shows and other media for more than a decade. Could you give me one concrete suggestion as to make this meet requirements. Most of what is published is in Japanese. The sir Thomas Lipton King of Teas is a TVCM, but it is also a movie of 3 minute for promotion of the Lipton brand, not an ad. There are both.

I was looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dante_Carver#cite_note-6 and see that a majority of the links do not work, the references no longer exist and the content is at best 6-7 years ago. What makes that article meet requirements.

I am totally open to a suggestion. Based on wiki guidelines, I need just one reference, minimum. Give me a hint.

Much appreciated!

Ho, how can I become a Wiki administrator? ;-)


 * Delete I concur with the nomination. The article needs independent, reliable sources showing why Mr. Hobart is notable as required by WP:ENT. Unfortunately, it does not do that.Astro4686 (talk) 06:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails both WP:NACTOR and WP:SIGCOV .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.