Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Humes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Mark Humes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable artist/broadcaster lacking non-trivial support. red dogsix (talk) 16:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep His work with WP paladin radio and The Center for American Military Music Opportunities (CAMMO) as a disabled veteran is notable --Beckycontrols (talk) 17:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - A subject is not presumed to be notable based on what they are involved in, but rather if it meets the Wikipedia criteria. Per Wikipedia, "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." The article lacks non-trivial support.  red dogsix (talk) 21:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as searches noticeably found nothing better and this is not enough convincing to actually keep with no better signs of applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. Chrisw80 (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Also does not meet WP:AUTHOR. (One book, self-published.) LaMona (talk) 22:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.