Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark J. Brenner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Drafted and usefied by the user himself (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  02:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Mark J. Brenner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability. I can find brief quotes from him in a number of articles (such as the LA Times one used as a reference), but that's him acting as a spokesperson for his company; he is not the topic. The other sources are affiliated (such as the chamber of commerce he's a director of), databases (such as Bloomberg), or things he wrote himself. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Note: Nominator switches !vote to userfy (see below.)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete perhaps at best for now as none of this has better convincing signs of the applicable notability, questionable. SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

I agree with both of you after reviewing the case here. Is there a way I can take down the article, and step it down to a user subpage where I can keep working on it until it becomes notable enough? 716arvin (talk) 17:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure there's a procedural way to properly interrupt the process here, but I have switched my request above to userfy (i.e., the move you're requesting), which is likely to be the end result. --Nat Gertler (talk) 18:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Right now I'm going to move the page to a user sub-page. I'm assuming this is the correct action process. If not, someone just ping me and let me know the right way. Thanks. 716arvin (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.