Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Jackson (executive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing early - clear evidence that the subject fails WP:GNG.

Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 17:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Mark Jackson (executive)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable business person that lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus WP:GNG isn’t met, neither is WP:BIO or WP:BASIC. A before search shows me materials predominantly in user generated unreliable sources, press releases and sponsored posts Celestina007 (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. Being a CEO of a non notable company doesn't really add to notability. LibStar (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete NO RS here to indicate notability of this article content.Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:53, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, Fails WP:GNG, no reliable sources Alex-h (talk) 09:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, He is the CEO of a non notable company that won't establish his noatblity. MerliSter (talk) 00:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, Open and shut. No where near WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 18:26, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up enough to pass GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.