Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Jones (media)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. - Bobet 22:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Mark Jones (media)
Article was nominated for deletion via WP:PROP. No case is made for notability, except unreferenced assertion of "renown". Writing for The Times is not itself a mark of notability. RobertG &#9836; talk 15:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I originally prodded this article for being non-notable and lacking sources. Having seen the editor's full attempt at asserting notability, definitely delete. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; ciphergoth 16:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for failure to establish notability as per WP:BIO. Eddie.willers 04:05, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Whilst editors may not be in the know of is relevence in the empowering of young people. His upcoming second national tour later this year is supported by the UK Government, in which he has personal backing of Education Secretary Ruth Kelly, and previous Shadow Education Secretary, now leader of the Conservative Party - David Cameron MP. With a little bit of research this can be supported. I also see you have Lynda Waltho placed as 'a famous person' in Stourbridge. She is one of the said MPs to support the education campaign on a local level, on behalf of the UK Government. She can be contacted.

As a completely seperate comment to this. Having been a reader of Wikipedia for quite some time you can't be feel that editors often come accross as 'know it all's' who when it comes down to it, don't know a lot apart from there own first hand knowledge. As someone who has worked in education for over 30 years, I find it quite remarkable how, Wikipedia advertises itself as an independent website, yet if certain people who are not knowledgable of a certain somebody or something, inclusion is questioned.

JL


 * Delete per nom; I don't see this meeting WP:BIO. Response to diatribe withheld. -- Kinu  t /c  07:48, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.