Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Levesley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Mark Levesley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG, google brings up a whole lot of sites selling his books but that is all. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:37, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 24.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 04:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 00:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:01, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now as I found nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  06:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete; no coverage to be found whatsoever. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  22:11, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.