Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Louis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Mark Louis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just fails WP:NHOCKEY but otherwise also appears to fail WP:GNG per only WP:ROUTINE sources (signings, trades, etc.). Yosemiter (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Superficially qualifies under WP:NATHLETE as the Elite Ice Hockey League is the "top professional league" in UK but for a Canadian player, NHL would be the correct league, and he didn't even get his cup of coffee there. All other coverage falls under the category of WP:ROUTINE transactions - not even game reports.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:NHOCKEY is part of and supersedes the basic NATHLETE. Yosemiter (talk) 23:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. He's played 37 games in the EIHL so far, so he satisfies NHOCKEY #1. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't satisfy NHOCKEY. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Incorrect, the EIHL can only be used to qualify via criterion #4 of NHOCKEY as further explained in WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment. These leagues have been assessed by their independent secondary coverage into the tiers as described. Yosemiter (talk) 02:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.