Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Macias


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Mark Macias

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article created by SPA. References are substantially self-refs, literally press releases or to non-RSes. No significant third-party RS coverage sufficient to source a BLP, let alone one of this length. WP:BEFORE shows only press releases and promotional coverage. This is the cut-down version, before the worst of the promotional adds were removed (then restored by another SPA). David Gerard (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. (1) We have a fairly strong consensus that producers are WP:MILL and thus almost never notable, and (2) everybody knows in 2020 that we are a charity, not your resume's webhost. Bearian (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Clearly not everyone knows we are not a resume webhost since people are still adding bio articles that are their resume.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG just a promotional piece for a PR company owner. Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the 'references' are crap - mentions in-name-only and some, not even that. David notMD (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone's spent a lot of time trying to find evidence of notability, and failed to come up with anything that qualifies. Maproom (talk) 08:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.