Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Magrs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Mark Magrs

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cannot see significant coverage of this writer and radio producer. Current sources are: I've carried out WP:BEFORE and not found anything to add, though I have updated the New Writing North link. Tacyarg (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Internet Magazine for Voice-overs & Radio Commercial Producers - passing mention, "Mark Magrs has been appointed as new Head of Production at Century Radio".
 * Article in local paper, The Shields Gazette, dead link.
 * Publisher's page for book, dead link.
 * Times Educational Supplement article to which the wiki article says Magrs contributed, dead link.
 * Profile on New Writing North - he won a Northern Promise Award, but I don't think this makes him notable.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.