Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Mathis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sorry, but WP:V is non-negotiable. No reliable sources have been identified. No pejudice against an article on Mr Mathis being created if/when reliable sources can be found. Neıl ☎  13:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Mark Mathis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Many issues: lack of sources, non-neutral POV throughout, poorly written, reads like a commercial for the subject, neologism, non-notable. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 16:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral Article needs a major re-write IMO he passess WP:N. BigDunc (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a job for cleanup, not AfD. Rescue-tagged -- RoninBK T C 21:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: unless and until somebody comes up with some significant coverage in independent reliable sources, per WP:NOTE. This article has been in existence for nine months, so it isn't as though there hasn't been plenty of time to bring it up to scratch. HrafnTalkStalk 13:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone produces some reliable sources to establish notability. --Explodicle (talk) 16:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per efforts to rescue the article. Sincerely, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 17:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: these "efforts" haven't turned up a single source, so amount to little more than "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" in terms of "rescue". HrafnTalkStalk 18:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.