Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Matthews (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 02:09, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Mark Matthews (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Superfluous dab page, hatnotes on 2 relevant pages suffice. Page is orphaned and an unlikely search term Tassedethe (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.   —Tassedethe (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as valid dab page - two valid bluelinks to two Wikipedia articles. B.Wind (talk) 00:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep this is a reasonable dab page. (If deleted, the second page needs a hatnote; also, not sure that Mark Matthews (Seattle) is a useful rd.) There are other people named "Mark Matthews" in this site's articles already; see, for example, Sydney Theatre School, The Dentists, and Radio Tees. JJL (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - if the dab page has only two links, hatlinks should be placed on the two articles pointing to each other. A dab page is appropriate when there are three or more articles to disambiguate between. WP:DAB WP:HAT  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  01:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems like a reasonable dab page to have. Hogvillian (talk) 02:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, hatnotes suffice at the moment, but it's a common enough name for it to not be so for much longer. - Mgm|(talk) 12:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the style guidelines. Currently, it's a navigational aid page that provides no navigational aid. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.