Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Maxey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ST47 (talk) 04:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Mark Maxey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable filmmaker, pushed by COI editor –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 01:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee  (Oh hai) 01:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:45, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:45, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:45, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The COI is pretty obvious, both on this. page and on the film Up to Snuff, (Articles for deletion/Up to Snuff),   But the thing is, the sources exist for film and filmmaker.  Maxey has a track record as a TV producer that has generated some awards, some news coverage.  And Up to Snuff has generated feature coverage of Maxey.  I added a few recent articles about him making the film to the page.  I think it now passes WP:BASIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:19, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:HEY - article was sourced during discussion. Argument for keeping boils down to :
 * Up to Snuff - his sole documentary film.
 * minor coverage of Maxey's role as producer of Up to Snuff in articles about the film
 * Emmy Award in 2015 for excellence in television production for "American Veterans Center Honors."
 * a profile in his hometownn newspaper: Valverde, Rochelle (July 6, 2015). "Lawrence native wins Emmy for excellence in TV production". Lawrence Journal-World. E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:39, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - I count at least 5 WP:RS. Any COI authors doing COI stuff and not meeting Wikipedia COI policies ought to be dealt as per policy; but as far as the article is concerned, it looks good. XavierItzm (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:ANYBIO the subject has an EMMY. Major award makes the subject a a major player.  Lubbad85   (☎) 21:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - It's a bit of a stretch to say he won an Emmy. His show won a National Capital Chesapeake Bay Emmy, which is for television productions in the Maryland/Virginia/D.C. area. This is officially part of the Emmys, but to say he won an Emmy is misleading. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 21:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment An Emmy is exactly that...an Emmy. "Mark Maxey is an Emmy award-winning Executive Producer." There is nothing misleading about that statement.  Lubbad85   (☎) 23:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * My comment was more in response to Major award makes the subject a major player. A NCCB Emmy is NOT a major award, and so therefore does not automatically prove that the subject is notable. I should have made that more clear initially. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 23:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep having been inclined to delete i've changed opinion due to the improvement of the article with the addition of multiple reliable sources, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:25, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.