Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Mikita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Speedied as a copyvio Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Mark Mikita

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

These two articles relate to a fighting style and its "creator" and are very similar in content. Most references are self-published sources. Notability not established by credible independent sources. WWGB (talk) 11:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC). I am also nominating the following related pages:


 * Delete both:, per nom... unless additional sources can be provided. Any print articles from newspapers? I'm only finding superficial references online that don't seem to add to an argument for notability. I'd be happy to be convinced otherwise. -- Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 11:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 11:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this and delete Fightology as not notable. Crude attempt at creating notability by use of Wikipedia by editor with probable WP:COI and no previous interest in editing. --Boston (talk) 12:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Tagged for a speedy & blanked as a copyright violation of this page --Nate1481 13:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Fightology is a copyvio of other parts of the site stitched together --Nate1481 13:26, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.