Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Naimark

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP

Mark Naimark
This Ukranian mathematician only returns 37 hits on google.  Is there something in particular that makes him distinguishable from other PhD's and worthy of note on Wikipedia? GRider\talk 00:46, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep, cleanup and expand. Borderline notable for me. Megan1967 05:29, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. If there is a MacTutor biography of him, I trust the Scots that he is an important mathematician. / u p p l a n d 07:10, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone can substantiate. The article does not establish notability beyond the average professor, thus fails the professor test. Radiant! 09:16, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep he is an important and distinguished mathematician. See  ~10.000 hits. Look at Gelfand-Naimark-Segal_construction,Gel%27fand-Naimark_theorem. MathMartin 21:42, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Whoa. That's a definite keep. DS 22:50, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Deletioncruft.--Centauri 12:09, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable figure. JamesBurns 06:25, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Mikkalai 22:37, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)