Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Nielsen (CEO)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There are four editors in favor of keeping the article and two in favor of deletion, and both votes for deletion ( including the nominator) were made before the discovery of reliable sources by Caponcrush. (non-admin closure) Jackattack1597 (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Mark Nielsen (CEO)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG lacks reliable sources Articuno appears (talk) 09:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Insufficient independent reliable sources to show notability. References give in the main just passing references to him. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Articuno appears (talk) 09:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Has indepth coverage in reliable Australian websites and news magazines. As per WP:THREE, these 3 sources talks indepth about the subject. . I am also adding few more additional sources, , , , ,  etc. Caponcrush (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * These aren't journalistic articles about him, they are a promotional piece by the magazine that gave him an award, and a piece where he is quoted on a different subject - i.e., it is not about him. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Seems to have some indepth coverage to qualify for GNG. Purosinaloense T/K 12:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Media Week and CEO Magazine have in-depth coverage. Business Insider and NY Post are very notable publications. He passes WP:GNG.Webmaster862 (talk) 05:11, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep As per the sources presented above, meets WP:GNG. Hypogaearoots (talk) 16:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG, Has indepth coverage in notable websites. Zackdasnicker (talk) 13:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.