Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Peel (chef)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Mark Peel (chef)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only a single ref and that appears to be a dead-link. Fails WP:GNG totally. Nothing about the text suggests that notability will be easy to demonstrate.  Velella  Velella Talk 23:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Peel is a highly notable chef. Google shows 116 references in The New York Times alone including .  This article needs work, not deletion. --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep In addition to the New York Times coverage, he is discussed extensively in a book called Super Chef: The Making of the Great Modern Restaurant Empires. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  03:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. He's notable, even if the article needs more citations. There are plenty out there. Maybe you could add some. I'll add one now. Bangabandhu (talk) 00:53, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep – Passes WP:BASIC. For starters, see the news sources available in this search (don't forget to scroll forward past the first page). See also section D of WP:BEFORE. North America1000 15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep because there has been a little bit of WP:HEY, but mainly because this would never have come to AFD if Nom had followed WP:BEFORE.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.