Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Roesler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Mark Roesler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Time to put a stop to this. While the tone here is not overly promotional, it is part of an effort by to put this guy and his company, CMG Worldwide, on the map. This has been deleted before, most recently by --a version maybe just different enough for me not to pull the trigger right now and just delete it per WP:G4. Note that other edits made by the creator all embellish this company's reputation and I will warn them.

In the meantime, though, we're dealing with this article, which has no decent sourcing whatsoever. There's a number of hits in Google News, and all of them confirm that Roesler is indeed "Chairman and CEO of CMG worldwide", but I see no in-depth coverage that proves he's notable by our standards. Drmies (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. No indication of notability, no sources other than the websites of the subject himself or his company. Already in use as a coatrack to bootstrap a stealth article on the company. It's already been deleted six times; I don't see anything suggesting it won't be recreated yet again, so WP:SALT. TJRC (talk) 20:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment My previous deletion was a speedy G11, and previous deletion by speedy does not justify use of G4. Rather, G4 can only be used after prior deletion by a community decision at AfD  DGG ( talk ) 02:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Right--thank you, . I think that I saw in the log what I wanted to see: it's been deleted six times already, but they're actually all speedies, none of them followed discussion. Either way, G4 shouldn't have been based on your deletion. I guess it's not a bad thing that we have a community discussion for an article that made its first appearance in 2007. Drmies (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment What is actually needed is a NPOV article on his company. There are sufficient sources. He appears as its spokesman,not as havignseparate notability.  DGG ( talk ) 22:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable lawyer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.