Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Satterthwaite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Shoerack (talk) 12:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Mark Satterthwaite

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability. While Satterthwaite may be known for his theorems, few alternative secondary sources exist about him. Non-notable topics with closely related notable articles (for this topic articles include: Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem, Muller–Satterthwaite theorem, and Myerson–Satterthwaite theorem) or lists are often merged into those pages, while non-notable topics without such merge targets are generally deleted. I have failed to find sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of this subject. On 13 Feb 2018, I posted on the talk page calling for good faith efforts to determine notoriety, find additional sources, to then attempt to merge any independently-verifiable content into a broader article, however no such information appears to have been found and thus this article meets the criteria for deletion. Thank you. Aeroplanepics0112 (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Economics, California, Illinois,  and Wisconsin.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:19, 30 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep per criterion 5 of Notability (academics) guideline:
 * "The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon."
 * Additionally, Google Scholar indicates Dr. Satterthwaite's publications have been cited 14,586 times. -- A. B. (talk • contribs •  global count)  05:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Easy passes of WP:Prof and WP:Prof. Nominator should carry out WP:Before before making further nominations. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC).
 * Keep per above, the citations for individual papers are very impressive as well, including a couple over 3000 by Google scholar's count. &mdash;siro&chi;o 06:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. Beyond the above (and the multiple earlier named chairs listed by his faculty bio), he has a double pass of WP:PROF evident in the article at the time of nomination, through fellowship in the Econometric Society and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (by far the better of the two AAAS's). It's not a long article. You should read it before nominating it for deletion, and understand how what you read relates to our academic notability standards. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets multiple NPROF criteria and in addition having his name in several notable theorems further reinforces notability. -- Mvqr (talk) 12:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.