Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Simmons (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:50, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Mark Simmons (author)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Notability, COI. This is a businessman who has co-authored 2 books and co-authored an app. COI (Autobiography?): The picture is taken directly from the subject's personal website. The primary editor has the same name as the subject. Notability: there are only 2 (that I found) reliable, 3rd party mentions of the subject - one from when he was running a (seems defunct) business and one a blurb about one of the books and basically mentions his name branding legend". I could find no reliable 3rd party articles or books that confirm any of the personal details of the subject or the subject's impact on the world. The rest of the supporting citations were dead links or primary sources.EBY (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete It is hard to find any notability here. The articles in Ad Week are more about the company and its advertising products than about the person, although his name is mentioned. All of that is normal, but not notable. There would be a stronger argument if the "punk advertising" movement itself had gained notability, but from searches that does not seem to be the case. LaMona (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.