Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Tanner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Mark Tanner

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability issues - Has been primary-sourced and orphaned for years, and I can find no obvious secondary sources to justify the claims in the article. Orderinchaos 03:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  —Orderinchaos 03:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 03:48, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not seem particularly notable. Also article is orphaned and looks to have been created by a single-issue user. Probably should have been Afd years ago! (Talk Contribs) 04:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I attempted to find reliable sources for the article prior to tagging it for notability and had planned to come back and nominate it for AfD if I couldn't find anything after a couple of days. As the assertions of notability cannot be verified, the article should be deleted. --Jezebel's Ponyo shhh 04:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: see article Nile. Search for Mark Tanner. This article may form a basis for cross-linking. Provided the other claims can be interlinked as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.166.233 (talk) 12:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:37, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.