Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Thompson (blogger)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 16:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Mark Thompson (blogger)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Maybe time for this article to go, not improved after 3 and half years. I'm not convinced an award to a Liberal Democrat by Liberal Democrat Voice is a convincingly claim of general notability. As for his occasional appearances (and article in) the press, they're by him but not abouthim. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete His coverage is not enough to pass GNG, and the award being a best new of the year award for a specified group, does not come off as major.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now - It seems the award is the best thing holding this and my searches found this (Books) which was the best result aside from links for the award and finally Highbeam and Thefreelibrary both found nothing. SwisterTwister   talk  16:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.