Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Tournier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Missvain (talk) 22:43, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Mark Tournier

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  22:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep Only 3 FC and 1 LA matches, but there is a lot of coverage in match reports and other bits from all over his career, from club cricket to FC cricket. There's this in the telegraph about his uni cricket, and there's lots of coverage of when he played against international sides, which I imagine will have been covered more in Wisden. No real redirect as played for 2 different sides if needed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Finding what Rugbyfan22 has found also, I'd say it satisfies GNG. StickyWicket (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The only sources in the article at present are the usual CricInfo/Cricket Archive, and I only see a couple mentions of him in game reports here and there, mostly the Telegraph. Easily fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  T · C  14:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 04:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete As per nom fails WP:GNG, nothing significant notable here. Sanketio31 (talk) 09:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Telegraph mentions are routine match reports and not SIGCOV, so he does not meet GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 00:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rugbyfan22.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 17:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kichu🐘 Need any help? 07:26, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.