Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark V SOC

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus default to Keep. Essjay ·  Talk 09:16, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Mark V SOC
Not quite a speedy (although nearly everything else this contributor wrote was), but still not an article. Perhaps if rewritten from scratch we might have something, but I'm not sure. -R. fiend 20:29, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

In cleaning up old vfd debates I have come across this one and no-one has voted one way or the other. I am re-listing it therefore under today's date. -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:07, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Substub, substub, go away. Come again when you've more to say. JesseW 02:21, 4 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep as rewritten and expanded. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 07:55, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete under criteria A1. Article doesn't appear to contain enough information to warrant inclusion. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 02:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

*Redirect' to U.S. Navy SEALs and add half-sentence based on |this website. Septentrionalis 02:39, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (so to speak). Not an article. Gazpacho 02:34, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete craftcruft. -Splash
 * Keep the rewrite. -Splash 04:09, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Septentrionalis 22:13, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not an article. - Mgm|(talk) 10:10, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete There is some Google hittage and it is apparetnly a military speedboat of some nature. If the article not just two lines of words thrown together I would say keep. If someone in the future actually wants to rewrite and expand, I say do it! FunkyChicken! 15:19, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Actually qualifies for CSD under item 1 (very short items providing little or no context). It is a valid topic, but it shouldn't have an article until someone can actually write one Cynical 15:30, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep-Comment I've rewritten it, I think it looks decent enough to keep at this point. Rx StrangeLove 03:11, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks like a good save. Changing my vote to keep. -R. fiend 03:55, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

--Searayman 14:10, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

its a keeper!! I just added a bunch of new informationa and a picture, and will be addeding more as this is my favorite boat in the whole wide world and the United States Navy SWCC are kick ass!


 * Cleanup, removing fanboy comments as illustrated in statement above. -- Necrothesp 15:08, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Arrg! Getting worse again. I cleaned it up though (some of the additions were good, anyhow). -R. fiend 16:24, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page..